Sustainable Organizational Growth Requires Organization Structure to Follow Strategy

Introduction
The success of business organizations measured in terms of survival and  achieving sustainable growth is dependent on the soundness of their strategic decisions, and the capacity to act on these decisions in a timely manner. Strategic decisions can be identified by the strategic 'issues', events or factors that trigger them. These triggers may include observed issues such as decrease in sales or sales growth, a new product entry by competitor(s); and events such as request for action from executive management, or simply a regular planning cycle. Strategic decision-making involves "issue" comprehension, concepts structuring, and concepts formulation into cause-effect relations model. While the cause-effect relations model is a deductive reasoning model, the issues comprehension that triggers it involves choice of assumptions which is to some extent arbitrary and inductive in nature. Strategic decision-making is an ongoing cognitive process whose outcomes are usually contingent on the behavior of other actors (individuals or organizations) affected by the decision’s outcomes. Strategic decisions affect the overall positioning and direction of the organization, they are different from operational decisions which affect day-to-day activities in operations to implement the strategic decisions. Strategic decisions are among the main means through which management choices are actually realized

Challenges to Strategic Decision-Making
In the absence of certain cause-effect relationships or experience in how these dialectical processes between organizations will unfold, the firm can only hypothesize about the implications of different possible initiatives and learn more about them through interaction with other actors such as competitors, regulators, customers, suppliers, and partners in its competitive landscape. Decision makers need then to engage in a cognitive process that demands them to create new solutions based on old experiences in the form of heuristics (rules of thumb, common sense, intuition or educated guesses). In these situations, managers face the extremely difficult problem in making decisions that demand a long-term perspective, committing the firm in the long run within a competitive landscape that is unlikely to stand still. The uncertainty and complexity of the situation demands that we take ‘short cuts’ that we can identify only if we have experience dealing with similar problems.

Managers need the decision making skills and judgment to identify and analyze factors that can affect outcomes and value delivered. Typically, the value delivered by enhanced and/or strengthened assets is causally and temporally separated from the successful completion of the strategic initiatives (resulting from strategic decisions) that produced those assets, through cause-effect relationships that may involve two (2) or more stages; making it difficult for managers to fully comprehend the contribution of these assets to the strategy implementation/execution success or failure. 

For strategic decision-making process to work most effectively each decision must be decisive with its set of related actions and activities integrated seamlessly and holistically integrated with other decisions within the organization through the organizations governance and control mechanisms as well as the Operations Systems, as the strategic decisions are the main means through which management choices are actually realized..

Understanding Sound Strategic Decisions
Strategic decisions concern situations characterized by their high complexity, as they relate to problems with multiple and related dimensions and their high uncertainty; as they are characterized by the independent behavior of different actors, making it very difficult to choose the best course of action analytically. Examples of strategic decisions include:

1. New Business Investment Decision - (e.g., acquisitions, mergers, Joint Ventures, New Company Establishment).
2. Investment in capital equipment or new capability.
3. Investment in the marketing domain - (e.g., New Products Introduction, New Marketing Channels, etc.).
4. Internal Organization Investments - (e.g., internal reorganization, investments in new information Systems, etc.)

Strategic decisions are a form of managerial decisions that deal with situations for which the desirability of the range of possible alternative courses of action cannot be assessed exhaustively relying on ‘packaged’ knowledge (at least in a reasonable time frame). Strategic decisions, when compared to operations decisions (e.g., which jobs to schedule into production, etc.), or mundane managerial decisions (e.g., where to hold a company's picnic, etc.), or customer choice decisions (e.g., selecting a particular brand of tooth paste, etc.) are indeed 'messes' (Ackoff, 1974); they are typically more complex, novel and open-ended (Mintzberg, Raisinghani and Theoret, 1976) and are characterized by independent elements 'that by definition cannot be formulated, let alone solved, independently of one another.' (Mitroff and Emshoff, 1979:1).

The quality of strategic decisions can be improved by enabling managers and decision makers to improve:

•  their understanding of the influence of their decisions on environmental factors and ither decisions,
•  their capacity to handle the cognitive burden associated with the inter-relationships among strategic choices,
• their awareness of the arbitrary nature of their choice of assumptions and ensure these are assumptions are monitored.
• their negotiations with other decision makers through shared understanding.  
  

Strategic decisions provide the context for operational decisions, ensuring that they are consistent with strategy.

The outcomes of strategic decisions are usually contingent on effects - the behavior of other actors affected by the decisions' actions. These recursive relationships between decisions, decision outcomes, and effects on other actors' behavior make strategic decisions messier and more complex than operations decisions.

Understanding Strategic Risks
Strategic decisions always represent risk because they deal with the future and changes in behavior of organizations and institutions which cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty. Strategic risks arise from executive decisions concerning the organization’s objectives, and the potential risks of failing to achieve those objectives.  These risks can be categorized as follows:

• Business Risks - These are risks that derive from the decisions that the board takes about the products or services that the organization supplies. They include risks associated with developing and marketing those products or services, economic risks affecting product sales and costs, and risks arising from changes in the technological environment which impact sales and production. The business assumptions we make and the risks we introduce to the organization during strategic planning. In fact, the assumptions we base strategies upon can mushroom into grave risks and show-stopper impediments down the line – appearing out of nowhere when the business attempts to execute to a seemingly well-laid plan.

 

• Environment Risks - The nature of strategic decisions make it possible for example, for decision makers e.g., managers within an organization, to have widely varying and incorrect beliefs about environmental factors such as market facts. For example, customers’ utility for a product/service, and managers’ perceptions of the customers’ perceptions of quality for that product/service to be inversely related; These beliefs influence the choice of assumptions underlying the manager’s strategic decisions and determine decision success/failure. Most managers don’t understand that their choice of assumptions is arbitrary influenced by their beliefs and that they might not accord with reality so strategic decisions logically flowing from bad/erroneous assumptions can lead to bad/poor decisions which can in turn lead to poor/bad decisions and ultimately to strategies failing at execution.

 

• Organization Risks - Strategic risk levels link in with how the whole organization is positioned in relation to its environment and are not affected solely by what the directors decide. Competitor actions will affect risk levels in product markets and technological developments may mean that production processes, or products, quickly become out-of-date.

Understanding Operations Decision-Making and Decisions
Operational decisions relate to the daily operations of an organization and help move organizations towards their strategic goals. The countless interactions that take place in the organization on a daily basis represent the result of operational decisions, and their sheer volume can therefore bog down an organization and make it ineffective.

Operations decisions are based on ideas with very precise and established relationships between them enabling the firm to find, given certain premises, programmed, algorithmic solutions through formal analysis or computational methods. Operational decisions because of their frequency and the time constraints can be expressed  as a firm’s standard operating procedures (SOP) such as in:

• Production
  
• Invoicing,
  
• Issuing salary notifications, or
  
• Problems of optimization, i.e., setting a stock policy.

In all these cases, problems are simple enough to enable us to find “one best” solution, given certain premises, out of the exhaustive exploration of all the space of possible solutions. These decisions result in the countless interactions that take place daily in the creations and delivery of value to customers.

Operations management focuses on carefully managing the processes to produce and distribute products and services that realize strategic decisions to capitalize on opportunities. Operations Management decisions are concerned with the running of the day-to-day operations of a business or other organization as effectively and efficiently as possible.

Operational Risks
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or external events. Operational risk can arise from technology failures, human and technical errors in financial models and reporting or other internal control systems deficiencies. Operational risk can also arise from fraud perpetrated by internal employees or by external sources.

Summary
The recursive logic of thought and actions embedded in the strategic decision-making process is common to different levels of management functions and processes, each of which deals with different problems and relies on different sources of knowledge. These recursive relationships between decisions, decision outcomes, and effects on other actors' behavior make strategic decisions-making messier and complex.

The quality of strategic decisions can be improved by improving the strategic decision-making process, to make it work more effectively through analytic decision models and visualization of each decision with its elaborated set of connected intended actions and their effects - actors whose behavior are assumed to be impacted by the successful implementation and execution of the actions.

Strategic decisions are long-term in their impact; they affect and change the direction of the whole business/organization. They are difficult or expensive to reverse because they substantially alter (and irrevocably so in the short run) the relationships between the decision makers' organization and customers, competitors, etc. 
 

Introduction
Imagine a situation where the owner/CEO of a new barbershop business - a 3-year old barber shop for the airport markets in the US is faced with flat sales and revenue, high employee turnover and high customer attrition rate. The management wants to address these strategic issues and transform the organization into a winning one in two years. There are many things the owner can do; but s/he has to first take stock i.e., assess the current state of the organization in terms of its current capacity development level, its strengths and weaknesses, and how to capitalize on opportunities while mitigating threats. It is of vital importance that the owners understand their organization's existing capacity at the various levels/points where capacity is grown and nurtured; in an enabling environment, in organizations and within individuals.

Current State Assessment
The owner may begin the assessment at the organizational level by assessing the current state of talent in the organization.  People are the key strategic resource, and it is essential that the organization effectively utilize the know-how of their employees at the right places.  

This involves making assessments of the following factors:

1. What types of barbers/cosmetologists work in the shop?
2. Experience, skills and proficiency at cutting all types of hair,
3. Professionalism in engaging with customers and fellow workers,
4. Courteous customer service with empathy for customers' needs,
5. Are they formally trained and licensed barbers?
6. Knowledge about male/female grooming techniques and best practices? 
7. Organizational Culture?  

Talent alone however, is not enough to win in this business. From the organization's chosen strategy and strategic positioning; there are a number of other key factors that have to be in place to create a winning organization by influencing growth at various levels including enabling environment, organization and individual levels..

Organization Level
In addition to talent assessment, the owner must assess other factors that contribute to growth in an organization such as capacity development in cross-functional coordination, resource allocation, control and management, and communication.


Institutional Arrangements 
The policies, practices and systems that allow for effective functioning of an organization or group. These may include 'hard' rules such as laws or terms of a contract, or 'soft' rules like codes of conduct or generally accepted values. This is a critical element in building a winning team or organization; and entails the following:

• Ensuring workers in the relevant functional areas in the company have well defined roles (optionally documented), and are happy with their respective assigned roles and responsibilities.
• The owner must have well defined and articulated organizational values, and ensure the organization's rules including the shop practices derive from these organizational values which are lucid and fairly implemented.
• The owner must also focus on whether the right incentives are in place. This could be a system of awards and bonuses connected to shop results - and not individual performance, transparent and commonly agreed upon principles dictating how barbers join and leave the shop, access to ongoing education and training, etc.
• Furthermore, it is vital to develop and agree on an operations plan and strategy for engaging different classes of customers (i.e., customers that have preference for a particular barber, customers that want some social interaction, customers that are on a schedule or in a rush, etc.), which includes clearly defined playbook, expectations of shop employees, etc.  

Combined, these constitute the institutional arrangement which ultimately determines the shop's (team's) performance and ability to win. 

Accountability
Accountability exists when rights holders are able to make duty bearers deliver on their obligations. From a capacity development perspective, the focus is on the interface between service providers and their clients or service providers and oversight bodies. Accountability is important because it allows organizations and systems to monitor, learn, self-regulate and adjust they behavior in interaction with those to whom they are accountable. It provides legitimacy to decision-making, increases transparency and responsiveness, and helps reduce the influence of vested interests.

Accountability is yet another critical element in building a winning team/workforce. This entails addressing issues such as:

• Are feedback mechanisms in place among the barbers, management and customers and partners/supporters?
• Ensure the employees are accountable and have a sense of ownership for their work.
• Do they all have voice in the major decisions that affect the team development, such as resource allocation, picking new barbers, developing younger barbers, and supporting community events?

Within the team itself it is imperative that the owner/coach establish a system to gather feedback and suggestions from the barbers and act on those.


Individuals
In general, the organization's behavior is inconsistent with the organization's verbalized intended goals of sustainable growth. Employees and management are consistently late for work; the shop schedule is not adhered to; this creates a culture that is not supportive of the organization's strategy and its successful execution. The organization is constantly In violation of its airport concession contractual obligations, and its own published operating policies such as scheduled operating hours, employee tardiness, and code of conduct, etc.


Leadership
The ability to influence, inspire and motivate others to achieve or even go beyond their goals. It is also the ability to anticipate and respond to change. Leadership can be held at many levels, and its not synonymous with a position of formal authority. Although leadership is most commonly associated with an individual leader such as president of the company, it can also exist at the enabling environment level and organizational level.

Apart from the institution arrangements, the owner/shop manager must analyze the leadership structure of the shop. A winning workforce in the shop needs a focused and motivated team lead or shop manager who not only inspires when the shop loses one or two customers, but who also maintains the momentum and continues to fight even when the shop is gaining customers.

In addition to the manager/lead it is important that other barbers assume leadership roles as needed. For instance, when facing losing a customer because long waiting time for a particular barber, can that barber position others who have less workload, to alleviate the problem and win the customer?

Are there clear lines of communication between the owner and manager, the manager and the lead as well as other barbers on the shop floor? And what if the manager or one of the barbers is suddenly injured/ill?

[TBD]

These three levels influence each other in a fluid way - the strength of each depends on, and determines, the strength of the others. The owner may next look at the core issues that represent the domains where the bulk of the change in capacity development happens that seem to have the greatest influence on capacity development at the different levels described above.  These core isues include 

• Leadership -
• Institutional arrangements -  
• Accountability -
• Knowledge - Knowledge, or literally what people know, underpins their capacities and hence their capacity development. Knowledge traditionally has been fostered at the individual level, mostly through education. But it can also be created and shared within an organization, such as, through on-the-job training or even outside a formal organizational setting through general life experience, and supported through an enabling environment of effective educational systems and policies.  

Existing and Current Capacity Development
By airport concession services standards, such as accessibility (opening hours), ambiance, environment, customer service (reliability and consistency), etc., the shop performance is average to below average for a specialty retail service. The owner, a master barber, is skilled at cutting men's hair of any type, as well as being proficient at straight razor beard/head shaves. The barbers employed in the shop are young and skilled in cutting/shaving head/facial hair of men of with hair of various types (caucasian, black or asian), and knowledgeable about the basic techniques in cutting male head/facir hair.

The company lacks a formal organization structure with well defined and documented roles and responsibilities for its employees and management. The basic functions of executive management such as CEO/President, Owners/Board Members are not being performed. Its not clear what the vision and mission of the organization are and what values guide management decisions. There is no clear communication of organization's official and operative goals to drive identification of the key functional and results areas such as marketing, human resources, and shop operations, etc. that would be needed to successfully implement and execute the strategies to sustain the growth and survival of the business. The current employee turnover is very high; this is a reflection of ineffective hiring practices, and lack of appropriate incentive and reward systems to create an enabling environment where employees can thrive and prosper. 

In general, the organization's behavior is inconsistent with the organization's verbalized intended goals of sustainable growth. Employees and management are consistently late for work; the shop schedule is not adhered to; this creates a culture that is not supportive of the organization's strategy and its successful execution. The organization is constantly In violation of its airport concession contractual obligations, and its own published operating policies such as scheduled operating hours, employee tardiness, and code of conduct, etc. The shop is constantly in violation of airport concession operating policies and rules such as:

• Opening late in the mornings;
• Failing to have liners in the thrash bins and waste baskets at the barbers' stations;
• Failing to maintain clean and tidy workstations and the shop in general,
• Management and employees (i.e., barbers) are constantly late
• Employees constantly not showing up for booked appointments and keeping the customers waiting for long hours.
• Barbers display a lack of professional etiquette in dealing with customers and other employees.

Organizational Change 
The owner can build on existing skills, knowledge and expertise of the barbers in the shop. Expand capacity through training and workshops for the barbers, as well as developing organization's culture by involving them in daily drills and practices to improve the shops ability to deliver consistently high quality services in addition to products to win.







Summary
This brief scenario outlines some of the core issues that impact the success of the barber shop team, and some of the critical changes that would give the organization a better chance to see his business bend the revenue curve. Of course, beyond the control of the owner and barbers or customers are contextual issues such as injuries/illness, weather, airport conditions, etc., that might affect the outcome of a given customer episode.

Introduction
Strategy execution represents a disciplined and systematic process of directing and controlling actionable/decisive decisions and activities that make an implemented strategy work resulting in the transformation of the organization and its institutions to strengthen it, and lead to sustainable growth and improved performance. Strategy execution requires the effective interplay of cooperation between strategic management and operations management in combining deliberate and purposeful actions demanded by the intended strategy from the strategic plan, and emergent strategy - as-needed reactions to unanticipated developments and fresh competitive pressures to realize the actual strategy.

Factors Influencing Strategy Execution Success/Failure
Strategies may fail at execution for a myriad of reasons including the six (6) factors discussed below. All these factors are interdependent and their influences are non-deterministic; this typically, makes it very difficult for managers to comprehend the contribution of each of the factors to successful outcomes of strategy execution. ​Each of the factors influences execution success/failure in a different way; if an organization fails to pay proper attention to one of these factors, it can result in execution failure, therefore an organization needs a system and approach to support management in successful execution. ​

Complexity
In the context of strategy execution, complexity refers to challenges to understanding an issue due to lack of information and lack of insight into the problem domain due to:

• Uncertainty - This may derive from:

1.  lack of complete knowledge about the organization's external environment and the impact of environmental factors on the performances of potential strategies/strategic choices; e.g., launching a new innovative product into existing/new market; 
2. Doubts about how organizational values should guide the decision or choice of action.

•  Decision Complexity - This may derive from: the inter-relationship among choices. For example, the strategic decision to enter a new market will require a major allocation of resources across different parts of the organization such as marketing, finance, operations, etc. This in turn will lead to the consideration of other strategic choices associated with the primary strategic decision, resulting in cascading decisions which is a source of complexity..
• Social Complexity - This may derive from:

1. Differing Mental Models - Managers and decision makers having differing individual mental models (or mindsets) influence how people approach resolving the issues constituting a problem; how these issues relate and impact perceived implications in relation to the strategic choices open to them.
2. Cognitive conflict - Cognitive conflict among decision makers due to possible differences in the individual manager's interpretation of issues is reflected in disagreements among decision makers and/or individual managers' about the strategic choices to pursue.  

Organizations are by definition complex adaptive systems with several independent and interconnected factors that influence each other as well as the decision-making of several independent and interconnected stakeholders.

Poor Leadership Style
Poor leadership is manifested in a variety of ways, including:

1. Failure of leadership to clearly communicate the reasons for the new strategy and garner the appropriate support to create consensus
2. Failure to generate enthusiasm and motivation in order to overcome any pockets of doubt and resistance to change resulting from successful strategy execution  
3. Failure of leadership to orchestrate the processes and major initiatives
4. Failure to coordinate management and staff in properly performing their tasks to accomplish work.
5. Failure to clearly articulate and communicate the vision and mission as well as the organization's values.

Bad Strategy
A strategy may be defined variously as an approach to overcoming an obstacle; or a response to a challenge. A bad strategy is a strategy that does not define an approach/means to respond to a challenge (opportunity/threat) or solve a known problem. It reflects an organization's failure to face the problem. The strategy does not align with well diagnosed strategic issue and basic problem. A good strategy is a mixture of policy and action designed to surmount a challenge/problem.

Poor Implementation
This results in failure of strategic initiatives that define major efforts required to close identified strategic gaps so the organization can make progress towards its strategic goals. Poor implementation may result in weak strategic assets that do not close the strategic gap, and since execution takes place within the context of the implemented strategy, successful execution is unlikely.

Bad Strategic Decisions
Bad decisions result in the wrong outcomes. Bad strategic decisions are strategic decisions whose outcomes result in business failure/decline. Bad decisions may result from incomplete or short-circuited decision processes.

Strategic decisions are among the main means through which management choices are actually realized. They are difficult or expensive to reverse because they substantially alter (and irrevocably so in the short run) the relationships between the decision makers' organization and customers, competitors, etc. The decision's outcomes are usually contingent on effects - the behavior of other actors affected by the decisions and outcomes. These recursive relationships between decisions, decision outcomes, and effects on other actors' behavior make strategic decisions messier and more complex than operations decisions.

Poor Planning
This results in inefficient utilization of resources such as time and labor as well as lack of capacity to managing change. Poor planning may lead to strategy execution failure resulting from: bad or unrealistic schedules for project team members resulting in waste of time and poor time management; lack of clear definition of strategy and project objectives; lack of budgetary controls leading to misuse of funds, etc. 

Managing Strategy Execution
The actual strategy of an organization is realized through combined execution of the intended strategy - what managers have set out in advance and intend to do - as part of some important strategic plan, and as-needed reactions to unanticipated developments and fresh competitive pressures to realize the actual strategy New circumstances always emerge, whether important technological developments, rivals successful new products introductions, newly enacted government regulations and policies, etc., that create enough uncertainty about the future that makes it impossible for managers to plan every strategic action in advance and pursue their intended strategy without alteration.

Organizations need a system to support managers in influencing the effectiveness of planned actions (top-down) and as-needed adaptive reactions to unforeseen conditions ("unplanned" bottom-up strategy responses) in order to improve the likelihood of successful execution:
  

Introduction
Strategy implementation is one of three co-incident processes involves in the strategy management. Strategy implementation provides the connecting loop between formulation and execution and control; Strategy implementation is key to any organization's survival and growth; and requires the collaboration of everyone inside the organization, and on many occasions parties outside the organization. 

The focus of strategy implementation is strategic change in the organization; this is largely delivered through multiple simultaneous projects. Strategy implementation is the responsibility of top, middle and lower/line managers focused on building capacity (capacity development) through projects and programs to strengthen the organization, and enable it to better deliver value to customers and meeting stakeholders expectations. In a rapidly changing world any competitive advantage a firm creates is temporary and not sustainable; this requires changes to the firm's strategic plans and changes to the corresponding implementation plans.   

Factors Influencing Strategy Implementation Success/Failure 
Strategy implementation involves closing the gap between organization's current capacity development and the capacity development that the strategy calls for. And because of the rapid and on-going changes in the business position and technology the implementation is never fully completed. Strategy implementation fails for a myriad of reasons including the six (6) factors discussed below. All these factors are interdependent and their influences are non-deterministic; this typically, makes it very difficult for managers to comprehend the contribution of each of the factors to successful outcomes of their strategy implementation decisions.

Leadership Style
This is a capability the management of the organization must possess at decent levels to enable the organization's leaders and management to effectively organize, coordinate and communicate the organization's direction and vision to the workforce and keep them motivated and committed to achieve the mission and strategic objectives and goals.
​
Failure to properly perform the leadership functions can lead to the following:

1. Lack of emphasis on the interfaces within the organization
2. Failing to get employees buy-in in the new strategy
3. Failing to direct employee capabilities toward the new strategy
4. Failing to keep employees motivated and committed to the strategy implementation
5. Lack of controls in terms of progress reviews and appropriate corrective actions.

Information Availability and Accuracy
This is the organization capacity to provide information System of processes and information flows that link the organization together and make accurate information available in a timely manner to support effective decision-making, communication and learning.

Inadequate information systems capacity leading to poor Information Flows and availability of accurate information to support fast and accurate progress tracking, timely intervention, and corrective action at the right time and place.may result in obstacles to successful implementation because of the degradation in certain management functions such as:

1. Poor Coordination
2. Poor Strategic Decision-making such as late and/or timely decisions.
3. Bad Strategic Decisions

Uncertainty - Effects of Uncertainty
Uncertainty is a state of having limited knowledge of current conditions or future outcomes. Uncertainty deals with possible outcomes that are unknown; and is a major component of risk (the likelihood or scale of negative consequences). Uncertainty creates obstacles and challenges to decision-making due to limited knowledge of current conditions and gaps in future outcomes; and is manifested in management behavior such as:

1. Managers delaying decisions until data becomes more accessible and reliable; of course delaying some decisions brings its own set of risks of failure.
2. Managers lacking the skills and judgment to identify and analyze the factors that can affect outcomes which would enable them to identify likely risks (e.g., strategic, financial, operational, legal, etc.) and potential impacts.
3. Managers having no idea in the short-term how much value their investment decisions and projects have created in some future situation. Typically, the value delivered by enhanced and/or strengthened assets is causally and temporally separated from the successful completion of the strategic initiatives that produced these assets through cause-effect relationships that may involve two (2) or more stages making it difficult for managers to fully comprehend the contribution of these assets to the strategy execution success or failure. 

Risk is a certain type of uncertainty that involves the real possibility of loss.

​Organization Structure

The structure and operating principles as well as governance of the organization becomes more complex and critical to manage. Structure Alignment problems - the overall strategy not properly aligned (i.e., working) with the current structure; the way people and tasks/work are organized, and roles and responsibilities are assigned to people not aligned with strategy would lead to implementation problems. Weak structure can create obstacles to successful implementation manifested in the following ways::

1. Poor or inadequate information sharing
2. Unclear accountability of positions and roles
3. Working against the organizational power structure
4. Unclear roles and responsibilities
5. Motivations of employees not aligned with organizational purpose,

The structure enables strategic alignment which enables effective cascading of objectives, goals, and decision rights to the appropriate people (actors) in the organization with the capability and capacity to perform the actions at the right time and place to accomplish the requisite goals and objectives.

Organization structure provides an explanation of the decision-making process and clarifies the roles and responsibilities, allocation of human resources (the way people and tasks/work are organized and roles and responsibilities are assigned to people), and the enabled level of flexibility to respond to unexpected circumstances. The organization structure design and the degree to which it effectively enables managing complexity, coordination and control of organizational behavior is critical to effective decision-making as the decision rights cascade during strategy implementation and execution grows. Within the structure, rules, policies, and procedures are uniformly and impersonally applied to exert control over organizational members’ behaviors. .

Organizational Culture
Organizational culture is the collective behavior of humans who are part of an organization, and the meanings they attach to their actions. Culture includes the organizational values, visions, norms, working language, systems, symbols, beliefs and habits. Culture manifests itself in the particular way things are done in an organization including how decisions are made. It affects who gets hired, how they get trained (formally or informally), what behaviors get rewarded, who gets promoted, and virtually all organizational procedures and administrative protocols. 

Organization culture defines the particular way the organization solves problems of survival through adaptation to external environment and internal integration which is supportive of the strategy. Weak culture is by definition not supportive of the new strategy and leads to organizational behavior and performance problems that present obstacles and challenges to successful implementation. Unsupportive culture is reflected in organizational behavior such as::

1. Employees behaving in ways that prevent learning and development; they are unable to adapt to new mind sets (adopt new mental models).
2. Employees behaving in ways inconsistent with organizational values and principles. 
3. Organizational culture not supportive of the principles and values. Organizational culture can be supportive of the strategy by enabling: Learning and Development (Growth), Participatory Decision-Making, Power Sharing, Support and Collaboration, Tolerance for risk and conflicts.
4. organization is unable to change and adapt to new processes and practices

Execution requires supportive culture and demands ownership at all levels in the organization including management and workforce. People must commit to and own the processes and actions central to effective execution.

Human Resources
Human resources are the people that comprise the workforce including managers of an organization, and the adequacy of their competencies, knowledge and skills. Human resources represent one the category of assets employed by an organization to create and deliver products and services to customers. Poor Human Resource Management is manifested in the following ways:

1. Poor human resource policies and practices may lead to decreased productivity and poor quality.
2. HR systems inhibit the mobilization of new competencies and/or destroy existing competencies, contributing to organizational vulnerability.
3. Inadequate skills and misalignment
4. Lack of motivation and personal ownership.

Human resource management is a function concerned with ensuring that the organization obtains and retains the skilled, committed and well-motivated workforce it needs.  Strategic Human Resource Management is particularly focused on the alignment of human resources as a means of gaining competitive advantage. Strategic Human Resource Management is particularly focused on the alignment of human resources as a means of gaining competitive advantage in terms of the adequacy of their knowledge competencies, and skills. 

Technology Trends
Technological trends include not only the glamorous invention that revolutionizes the lives of the actors in the organization and its environments, but also the gradual painstaking improvements in methods, in materials, in design, in application, unemployment, and the transportation and commercial base nd their diffusion into new industries and efficiency. The rate of technological change varies considerably from one industry to another. 

Changing technology can offer major opportunities for improving goal achievement, or threaten the existence of the firm. Lack of organizational capability to adapt to technology changes is reflected in the conditions and gaps:

1. Forecast and identify relevant developments – both within and beyond the industry
2. Assess the impact of these developments on existing operations,
3. Define opportunities and threats
4. Lacking capacity development strength in creating technology strategy which deals with choices in. technology, product design and development, sources of technology, and R&D Management and Funding.

Changing technology can offer major opportunities for improving goal achievement, or threaten the existence of the firm due to unpredictable problems

Factors Supporting Effective Strategy Implementation
Effective strategy implementation and execution involves managing change in the organization's internal environment which then allows the organization to successfully adapt to the changing external environment in which it operates but cannot control. The key factors that support successful implementation and execution are the following internal environment elements:

1. People - "Do you have enough people to implement the strategies?" and "Do you have the right people in the organization to implement the strategies?" This core issues area relates to the knowledge, experience, and skills of the people (workforce) in the organization, and .is a determining factor in implementation success. Organizations invest in recruiting and training to build this capability critical to successful implementation.
2. Resources - Do you have adequate funding (financial strength) to support implementation, covering the costs and expenses that must be incurred in the execution of the strategies?" and "Do you have enough time to see the strategy throughout its implementation?" Financial strength is a factor in its won right that influences other internal environment factors. 
3. Structure - Is the structure clear-cut with lines of authority and responsibility defined and underlined in the "chain of command?" "Are the lines of communication throughout the organization clearly defined by management?" Organization structure is essentially defines how the work needed to carry out the mission is divided among the workforce/people.
4. Systems - What systems, tools, and capabilities are in place to facilitate the implementation of the strategies? What are the specific functions of these systems? Hopw will these systems aid in the implementatio? The availability of the appropriate systems can significantly impact the implementation and execution performance. If the right systems are not available,or the available systems are not up to expected standards then workers and management may be hindered in the performance of the duties. If the inadequate systems are used by customers then customer satisfaction will suffer.   
5. Culture - Organization culture is influenced by the values and beliefs of the organization, and manifested in the attitudes of employees and partners, and their ability to "go the extra mile". Negative attitudes can severely and adversely impact the organization's capacity to successfully implement and execute its strategies. 
6. Management - The capability of the management team and the leadership styles employed by managers will also have a major impact on employee morale and motivation, and organizational culture.

These factors are generally in agreement with the key success factors or prerequisites for effective strategy implementation as identified by the McKinsey.  

Organization capacity development can be measured in terms of changes in the enabling environment, organizational, and individual levels.

Each of the factors influences implementation outcomes (closing the gap) in a different way; if an organization fails to pay proper attention to one of these factors, it can result in implementation failure, therefore an organization needs a system and approach to support management in successful execution. ​​
​
Conclusion
The factors that influence the successful implementation of a strategy are interdependent and their influences are non-deterministic it is typically very difficult for managers to comprehend the contribution of these factors to the successful outcomes of strategy implementation making strategy implementation very hard.

Introduction
A strategic issue is a fundamental policy question or critical challenge affecting an organization's mandates, mission, values, stakeholders, resources, structure, processes, management, or product or service levels and mix, clients, users or payers, cost, financing, management or organizational design. It is vital that strategic issues be identified and dealt with expeditiously and effectively if the organization is to survive and prosper. An organization that does not address its strategic issues may be unable to head off threats, and unable to capitalize on important opportunities, or both.

Strategic Issues Diagnosis
Strategic issues diagnosis is a problem formulation process involving strategic decisions and decision-making processes to identify problems underlying strategic issues and of strategic relevance, and deciding on potential courses of action (strategies) to pursue to resolve the problem(s). Strategic issues by definition embody conflicts. These conflicts may be over ends (what); means (how); philosophy (why); location (where); timing (when); and who might be helped or hurt by the different ways of resolving the issue (who). Strategic issues must clearly relate to specific strategic problems facing the organization; additionally, they must be specific to the particular organization or industry.

Strategic Issues Identification Approaches
Strategic issues identification focuses organizational attention on what is truly important for the survival, prosperity and effectiveness of the organization - and provides useful advice on how to achieve these aims. There are three (3) basic approaches to the identification of strategic issues:

1. Direct Approach - In this approach, planners go straignt from a view of mandates, mission, and SWOT analysis to the identification of strategic issues.
2. Goals Approach - This approach is more in line with conventional planning theory which stipulates that an organization should establish goals and objectives for itself and then develop strategies to achieve those goals and objectives.
3. Scenario Approach - This approach involves the organization developing a "best" or "ideal" picture of itself in the futureas it successfully fulfils its mission and achieves success. The strategic issues then concern how the organization should move from the way it is now to how it would look and behave according to its vision.

In order for an issue to be raised and resolved effectively, the organization must be prepared to deal with the conflicts associated with the issue. 

Strategic Issues Problem Analysis
Analysis is the process of organizing and presenting information in an analytical way/manner that assists in better defining the problem scope or narrowing  down its causes so that solutions may be more effectively created. This includes such things as determining what caused the problem, why does it continue to exist, will it go away on its own, how long has it existed, how serious is it, how soon does it have to be solved, and what internal and external factors contribute to the problem.

Defining problems of strategic relevance is hard because identifying these problems is difficult, partly because of complexity induced by the complicated structures (composed of many interrelated sub-problems, possibly from different domains, e.g., such as expressed through business architecture domains, etc.) of these problems, uncertainty due to incomplete information, and turbulence in the environment. Problem analysis requires you to build a model of the problem, collect some data and information to test your hypotheses and assumptions underlying the problem to even discover what the real problems are to solve. The process is akin to an "empirical discovery loop" that enables systematicdiscovery and formulation of problems in complex real world situations such as strategy and policy making. Decising how to solve a problem once its been stated creates the need for more information and data gathering, and analysisand synthesis.

Strategic Issues and Problem Statements
Strategic problems are cross-functional in nature and have major long-term consequences for the organization's success because they impact the organization's competitive position. A statement (model) of a strategic issue should contain three (3) elements:

1. Description - The issue should be described succinctly, preferably in a single paragraph. The issue itself should be framed as a question the organization can do something about.
   
2. Factors - Factors that make the issue a fundamental policy question should be listed. In particular, what is it about mandates, mission, values or internal strengths and weaknesses, and external opportunities and threats that make this a strategic issue?
   
3. Consequences - The organization should state the consequences of failure to address the issue. A review of the consequences will inform judgments of just how strategic, or important various issues are. The strategic issues identification step focuses organizational attention on what is truly important for the survival, prosperity and effectiveness of the organization - and provides useful advice on how to achieve these aims. 
   

The problem model defines the problem scope, variables and factors, and narrows the assumptions of cause-effect relationships so that potential solutions may be more effectively explored.

Strategic Issues Diagnosis Outputs
The substantive outputs of strategic issues diagnosis are assumtions, cause-effects understanding (beliefs), predictive judgments, and symbolic language labels. These elements facilitate decision-making during the strategy (solution) development stages of strategic planning. Assumptions and cause-effect understandings, tacitly accepted or consciously explicated, are crylstalized in the form of predictive judgments.

• Assumptions - Assumptions are premises, conditions, events or attributes that are or must be taken as 'given' or true by any individual or group in exploring a strategic issue or problem. They are those data points, facts, or beliefs which in the view of individuals represent elements of the world around them. 
• Cause-effect understandings - In the course of resolving an issue or problem individuals generate understandings of how various events/conditions and concepts relate together in a causal manner. These beliefs are like the causal links which comprise cognitive maps except that they are specific to a particular strategic problem/issue.
• Predictive judgments - Predictive judgments are judgments that involve assessments of future events surrounding a strategic issue or problem. Some examples include: Estimates of the likely effectys of changes in such variables as marketing expenditures; definition of market boundaries; cash flow projections based on current or desired portfolio; R&D expenses and investment intensity on performance in ROI, cash flow, and/or market share.
• Symbolic Elements - Language and label for defining domain concepts. 

These elements which are substantive outputs of diagnosis can constrain or facilitate decision-making during the issues diagnosis and subsequent strategy formulation stages of strategic management.

Strategy Formulation - Defining Solutions to Strategic Issues
Strategy formulation is a problem solving process that results in a set of strategic alternatives/options – a set of hypothetical solutions to the problems identified from strategic issues diagnosis. In order to deliver value, a strategy has to enable change and adaptation of the organization to a problem; this requires that there are known problems to be solved. Strategic issues diagnosis provides the the methods for identifying strategic issues and problems facing the organization. Deciding how to solve the problem, i.e., strategy development, creates the need for more information and analysis. 

Formulating appropriate strategies to respond to strategic issues/problems is difficult. It often requires you to build a model of the problem, collect some data and information to test your hypotheses and assumptions underlying the problem to even discover what the real problems are to solve. Strategic decision-making involves choice of assumptions which is influenced by the decision makers beliefs which determine the success/failure of the decision. The nature of strategic decisions make it possible for managers within an organization to have widely varying and incorrect beliefs about environment factors such as market facts (e.g., customers' utility for a firm's product/service, and mangers' perceptions of the customers' perceptions of quality for the product/service to be inversely related). Managers must understand that their choice of assumptions is arbitrary and influenced by their beliefs, and might not accord with reality; so strategic decisions logically flowing from bad/erroneous assumptions can lead to failure. 

Benefits of Modeling Strategic Issues Diagnosis
Strategic issues diagnosis has a number of benefits including:

1. Improving the viability of strategic decisions by improving decision makers' knowledge about external environment factors and possible reactions of environment actors (stakeholders) such as customers, competitors, and broader public (i.e., society, regulators, community, investors - the world). .
2. Improving managers' capacity to overcome the cognitive burden/overload associated with the inter-relationships among strategic decisions and outcomes.
3. Improving managers' understanding of the fact that their choice of assumptions is arbitrary and might not accord with reality, and exposing strategic decisions that logically flow from bad or erroneous assumptions to risk of leading to bad or poor decisions.
4. Improving managers' awareness of individual differences in strategic choices due to differences beliefs and assumptions leading to better negotiated strategic decisions.

What is an Organization?
A model of the organization can be defined as a 4-tuple, composed by a set of goals and objectives, a set of (direct internal) sub-organizations, a set of institutional relationships, and a set of external organizations.

1. The internal sub-organizations are the organizational units linked by finite chain of direct internal sub-organization relations.
2. The external organizations are the organizations that have institutional relations with the organization of interest, but are not directly controlled by it.
3. The goals of the organization are derived from its stated purpose for existence; this is refined and assigned to its sub-organizations so these sub-organization units become jointly responsible for attaining the goals of the whole organization (organization-as-system).
4. Institutional Relationships - These define the norms, policies and rules of an organization.
   

An organization as a system is a set of interacting or interdependent functional entities and individuals/groups of individuals forming an integrated whole. It can be one organization, a set of organizations, population groups or individuals. Organization systems are “open”, social systems. Open systems are systems that continuously interact with their environments through acquisition of input, production of output, and exchange of information; they survive and grow by continuously adapting to their environment. An organization is a system in that it is greater than the sum of its parts. How it performs cannot be calculated by adding up all the work arrangements - like departments - with the resources and processes that connect it all together.

Organizational Policy
Organizations are social systems that depend on norms and rules - policies. Policies are recognized descriptions which act as enforcement mechanisms to restrain individual behavior and regulate all sorts of organizational interactions such as delegation, dependency relationships with internal/external organizational entities as well as defining concepts within the organizational setting.

Organization as Social Systems
Organizations as social systems are configurations of "actors" (human systems or people) connected to each other to compose a system with a common purpose and a set of objectives. The central conceptual modeling construct in modeling social systems in real world situations is the "actor". It is an abstraction which is used to refer to people (the active elements/entity) that is capable of independent action. In creating social network models of real world situations, we adopt as a premise that the social world is unknowable and uncontrollable with respect to the behavior of "actors" (human agents, individual or groups of individuals). Social systems are essentially goal-seeking, information feedback systems.

Organization System Sructures
The organization structure defines the arrangement of accountability, authority and responsibility of a group of people in a hierarchy, and network of functional and business units, and the governance relations between these units. The organization structure is designed to enhance communication and information flow among organization system elements (people or groups of people) that comprise the organization social system. Within the structure, rules, policies, and procedures are uniformly and impersonally applied to exert control over members’ behaviors.

Organizational structures are the manifestation of strategic orientations and regulate information flows, decision making, and patterns of behavior, that is, the “internal allocation of tasks, decisions, rules, and procedures for appraisal and reward, selected for the best pursuit of a strategy. Structures develop due to the need to organize behavior in a meaningful way and provide orientation for organizational members to set actions that comply with organizational strategy, organizational culture, and, as a result, accepted patterns of behavior. The structure is comprised of organization units that organize activity within these units (business units, bureaus, teams, or departments) in which people perform specialized functions such as manufacturing, sales, IT, human resource management, accounting/finance, etc. People who perform similar functions (tasks) are clustered together.

Actors
Actors represent the perspectives and objectives of the individuals themselves responsible and accountable for implementing the organization design and strategy through their behavior. Actors are taken to be inherently autonomous, i.e., their behaviors are not fully controllable, or are they perfectly knowable. Although the behavior of actors is not perfectly knowable or fully controllable, they are nonetheless not completely random. The behavior of actors can be explained and rationalized through the motivations and intentions attributed to actors.

Organization System Behavior
The behavior of an organization is usually guided by its strategic and tactical goals. The performance of the organization can be expressed through goal-based performance indicators and measures. Behavior and performance unfolds as observable manifestations (phenomena) of predefined strategies as regulated by organizational structures. This domain puts into effect patterns of behavior, derived from strategies and structures. It makes an organization’s existence as a market player visible.

Organizational System Dynamics
Organizations are dynamic social systems which are a collection of people with a common purpose. The dynamics of social systems are expressed in terms of the intentional properties of the actors that comprise the system, and the interaction relationships between these actors rather than the actual behavior of the actors. An intentional description of actors' behavior offers a way of characterizing actors that respects the autonomy premise underlying the actor concept.

Organization System Interactions
Interactions between actors can occur to satisfy goals that are either common to actors or global goals which pertain to the society (organization) as a whole and lay outside the scope of any one individual actor. Considering sub-organizations as a kind of structured logical actor, interactions among the sub-organization units can be viewed as a way of realizing society goals.

What is a  Strategy? 
The term "strategy" is an overloaded in everyday conversations because most people including professional practitioners do not bother to explicitly establish their point of view into what is essentially a layered concept that exists at three (3) levels such as corporate, business and competitive and functional layers. Essentially, when people use the word “strategy”, they are expressing concerns/interest in one of the layers of a layered concept; corporate strategy, business and competitive strategy, or “functional” strategy; and operations strategy .  

A strategy is an integrated and externally oriented concept of how a firm will achieve its objectives - how it will successfully compete against rivals. A strategy consists of an integrated set of choices related to elements from the corporate strategy, business and competitive strategy, and implementation method choices (M&A or “functional” strategy) layers.  

Levels/Layers of Strategy
The levels/layers at which strategy may exist in the organization include:

• Corporate Strategy - Corporate” strategy is concerned with the direction and scope of the organization in the long-term, Corporate strategy provides long range guidance for the whole organization by the choice of answers to the question - what business should we be in?.

 

• Business and Competitive strategy - Business strategy is concerned with decisions on the products and services that should be offered in the markets in the scope of the business context established by the corporate strategy. Competitive strategy is concerned with gaining sustainable advantage to successfully compete. it involves answers to the question, how do we compete in this business?This interpretation is consistent with all usage of the term in areas such as game plays/theory (i.e., in chess, football, soccer, etc.), military strategy, business competitive strategy, personal growth/development strategy, etc.

 

• Functional strategy - Functional strategies are concerned with how the functional areas defined by the Operations Strategy design contribute to business strategy.  Functional strategy  define where the functions of a business make long-term plans which support the competitive strategy being pursued by the business strategy. Functional strategies specify outcomes to be achieved from the daily operations of specific departments or functions. A Functional Strategy, for any business, large or small, focuses (the achievement of a goal) on the skills and abilities of individual departments and their employees.

 
Regardless of the person using the term, and the “type” of strategy being pursued the fundamental meaning of the word with respect to strategy type remains the same. Conceptually, a strategy in any of its myriad interpretation and manifestations, in any of these layers, is about decision making,
​
Operational Strategy - Operations strategy binds the various operations decisions and actions in functional areas into a cohesive consistent response to competitive forces by linking firm/organization policies, programs, systems, and actions into a systematic response to the competitive/strategic priorities chosen and communicated by the corporate or business strategy. Operations strategy is the collective concrete actions chosen, mandated, or stimulated by corporate strategy. Operations strategy defines how an entire business will allocate its resources to support operations and its strategic goals. Operations strategies focus on maximizing the efficiency and effectiveness of production while minimizing operating costs.

Actual/Realized Strategy
The actual strategy of an organization is a combination of the parts of the deliberate and intended strategy that is successfully implemented and executed, and emergent strategy - "realized pattern" that was not "expressly intended" that emerged. (Mintzberg, 1994;25). 

Deliberate Strategy
This is intended and planned strategy which is a result of the rational planning approach of strategy development. The rational planning approach (e.g., Ansoff, 1979) defines an objective in advance, describes "where we are now," and uses a prescriptive approach in which "the three (3) core areas - strategic analysis, strategy development, and strategy implementation - are linked together sequentially" (Lynch, 2000; 24).

Emergent Strategy
Emergent strategy is realized pattern that was not expressly intended or planned that emerged from execution Emergent strategy is undertaken by an organization that analyzes its environment constantly and implements its strategy simultaneously (Lynch, 2000; 26).