Aligning Business Strategy, Business & Operating Models for Business SuccessUnlocking the Secret to Business Success
Have you ever wondered how successful companies seamlessly translate their grand visions into day-to-day operations? The answer lies in the intricate interplay between business strategy, business model, and operating model. According to Harvard Business Review, a business strategy refers to the plan a company uses to gain a competitive advantage in the market by choosing a unique position and business model. A business model describes the logic of how a company operates and creates value for stakeholders. Operating model defines the tactics - the specific actions taken - to execute the strategy within the framework of the chosen business model. The patterns of decisions embodied within the strategy, business model, and operating model can be viewed as the strategic and operational engines that drive an organization toward success. The 'pattern of decisions' perspective emphasizes that a strategy or model (e.g., business model or operating model) is best understood by observing the consistent results (outcomes) of the actions taken. Think of the 'pattern of decisions' as the organization's track record, showing what it consistently does, as opposed to what it merely plans to do. Business Strategy: Management Perspective This perspective highlights a structured and organized framework of decisions made by management. It's more about the systematic approach and the interconnectedness of decisions that shape the overall strategy. It suggests a deliberate, methodical process where each decision is a part of a well-thought-out plan. The focus is on the management's role in systematically guiding the organization towards its goals. From management's perspective, a business strategy is a coherent system of decisions shaped by a structured framework. This framework defines strategic choices regarding how to uniquely position the organization in the market. These choices include:
It underlines the importance of the decision-making process, how these decisions are made, and how they fit together to form a coherent strategy. By considering these management decisions and factors, the business strategy aims to create a sustainable competitive advantage and achieve the organization's long-term goals. Business Strategy: Pattern of Decisions A business strategy is a pattern of decisions and actions that shapes a company's direction and influences its outcomes in a competitive business environment. This perspective focuses more on the observable outcomes of the decisions and actions taken over time. It's about the recurring and consistent behaviors that emerge as a result of these decisions. It implies that strategy can evolve organically based on the pattern of decisions made in response to changing circumstances. The focus is on the adaptability and the iterative nature of strategy. It addresses fundamental questions or problems related to strategic issues through a layered set of approaches across four key dimensions:
It highlights the overall direction and influence of the cumulative decisions and actions, rather than the specific process of making those decisions. These dimensions involve addressing specific strategic issues, forming layers of a comprehensive business strategy, which include:
By addressing strategic issues within these dimensions, a business strategy provides a structured approach to achieving organizational goals and maintaining a competitive advantage. It offers a framework for guiding a company's activities and ensuring they align with its long-term goals. Business Model: Management Perspective This explains the logic of how the company operates and creates value for stakeholders. It answers the "how" and "why" a company can generate revenue and sustain profitability. A business model, from the management's viewpoint, is a comprehensive system of decisions that collectively outline how an organization creates, delivers, and captures value. This system encompasses several key components:
Business Model: Pattern of Decisions Describing a business model from the perspective of a pattern of decisions emphasizes the dynamic and adaptive nature of how a company creates, delivers, and captures value. Here’s a breakdown:
By viewing the business model as a pattern of decisions, management can adapt and evolve the model in response to internal and external changes, ensuring sustained relevance and competitiveness in the market. This perspective emphasizes the iterative and dynamic nature of business decisions that collectively shape the organization's ability to create, deliver, and capture value over time. Operating Model: Management Perspective Operating model is the detailed plan that outlines how your organization will execute its business model. While the business model focuses on the “how you do it,” the operating model is all about the “how you do it day-to-day.” From the management's perspective, an operating model is a comprehensive system of management decisions that outlines how an organization will execute its business model effectively. This system encompasses several key components:
By integrating these management decisions into a cohesive system, the operating model provides a detailed plan for executing the business model. It ensures that all aspects of the organization--processes, structure, technology, human resources, performance management, governance, cost management, and continuous improvement—are aligned and working harmoniously to achieve strategic goals and deliver consistent value to stakeholders. Operating Model: Pattern of Decisions Describing an operating model as a pattern of decisions highlights the dynamic, adaptive nature of how an organization executes its business model. Here’s a breakdown of this perspective:
By viewing the operating model as a pattern of decisions, management can adapt and evolve operational practices in response to internal and external changes, ensuring sustained effectiveness and competitiveness. This perspective emphasizes the iterative and adaptive nature of operational decisions that collectively shape the organization’s ability to execute its business model successfully. How They Work Together Understanding the relationships between strategy, business model, and operating model.
Interconnection:
The strategy sets the direction, the business model translates that direction into a framework for value creation, and the operating model provides the detailed plan for execution. Understanding this interconnectedness helps ensure that all aspects of the organization work together harmoniously to achieve long-term success.
1 Comment
Leveraging Decision & System Thinking Lenses to Understand Business Strategy as SystemsIn the turbulent and complex landscape of modern business, a well-defined and adaptive business strategy is paramount for success. It acts as the organization's guiding star, enabling it to navigate uncertainties and achieve its desired outcomes.
At its core, strategy can be understood as an approach to address a fundamental problem or challenge, in a business environment, to create and deliver value to stakeholders. It involves identifying key issues and developing a plan of action to achieve specific goals and objectives. Role of Business Strategy in Navigating Complexity Business strategy plays a critical role in helping organizations navigate complexity by guiding their competitive positioning, resource allocation, and ability to adapt to challenges. A well-crafted strategy supports organizations in achieving long-term success by addressing the following aspects:
Business strategy equips organizations to remain focused, adaptable, and aligned with their mission and vision, even as they confront complexity. Role of Business Strategy in Addressing Business Problems A well-formulated business strategy serves as a structured approach for solving key challenges that organizations face. It provides the tools and insights needed to navigate obstacles while driving long-term growth and competitiveness. Some key critical areas where business strategy addresses fundamental problems include:
Through these problem-solving elements, business strategy provides a cohesive framework to achieve organizational goals, maintain competitiveness, and drive sustainable success. Well-Crafted and Implemented Business Strategy: Key Components A successful business strategy is a cohesive and dynamic framework that drives organizational goals through interconnected components. These components guide decision-making, ensure alignment with the organization's values, and adapt to external and internal factors. 1. Mission and Vision
Business strategy is the compass that guides organizations through the complexities of the business environment. By defining clear goals, analyzing the environment, and developing effective action plans, organizations can craft a strategy that is both well-structured and adaptable to challenges, ensuring long-term success and resilience. Business Strategy and Strategic Decision-Making Business strategy and strategic decision-making are not distinct processes but rather a continuous, dynamic cycle that drives organizational success. Strategic decisions shape the strategy, and the realized strategy, in turn, guides future decisions. This iterative interplay is crucial for navigating complex environments and achieving long-term goals. Strategy as a Framework for Decision-Making:
Strategic Decisions as Drivers of Strategy Adaptation:
The Feedback Loop: Realized Strategy and Future Decisions:
Resource Allocation and Performance Measurement:
By understanding and effectively combining business strategy and strategic decision-making, organizations can navigate complex environments, achieve their long-term goals, and maintain a competitive edge. This dynamic interplay ensures that the organization remains agile, adaptable, and aligned with its strategic vision. Strategic Decision-Making: Translating Management's Intentions into ActionsIntroduction
Strategic decision-making is the means by which management's intentions are realized. Strategic decision-making serves as the bridge between an organization’s ambitions and its operational reality. It is the mechanism through which management intentions—whether focused on growth, stability, innovation, or competitive positioning—are transformed into actionable strategies that guide the organization's trajectory. In an increasingly complex business environment, decision-making is not just about selecting the best option among alternatives; it is about aligning choices with the overarching vision while navigating uncertainties, resource constraints, and dynamic market forces. Systems thinking offers a valuable lens for understanding these complexities, enabling leaders to identify interdependencies, anticipate ripple effects, and optimize leverage points that influence strategic outcomes. This discussion explores the critical role of strategic decision-making in translating leadership intentions into tangible results. By integrating systems thinking and structured decision frameworks, organizations can ensure that their strategies remain adaptive, cohesive, and capable of driving long-term success. Understanding Strategic Decision-Making as A System Strategic Decision-Making as a System involves integrating structured management processes and interconnected strategic decisions to guide an organization's direction and align efforts with long-term goals and navigate complexity effectively. This system operates across multiple layers—corporate, business unit, and functional—ensuring that decisions are cohesive and adaptive. It incorporates elements such as resource allocation, stakeholder alignment, and risk management while leveraging systems thinking to address complexity and interdependencies. Strategic Decision-Making as a System
By treating strategic decision-making as a system, organizations can translate leadership intentions into actionable strategies that drive sustainable success. Key Components of the System
Strategic Decision-Making as a System of Layers Strategic decision-making operates as an interconnected system that spans multiple layers of strategy within an organization. By understanding and categorizing decisions at each level—corporate, business unit, and functional—organizations can ensure that leadership intentions are realized cohesively, efficiently, and adaptively. System Layers in Strategic Decision-Making
By viewing strategic decision-making as a layered system, organizations can synchronize actions across all levels, creating alignment and driving long-term success. Strategic Decision-Making Process for the Airport Barbershop Example: Strategic decision-making for the airport barbershop encompasses three critical stages: formulation, implementation, and evaluation and control. Together, these stages ensure that management intentions are fully realized, and the business adapts effectively to dynamic challenges. Formulation The formulation stage sets the foundation for the barbershop’s strategic vision of becoming the top choice for airport travelers seeking quality hair grooming and relaxation. Key activities include:
Implementation The implementation stage focuses on bringing the formulated strategies to life through precise actions and coordination. This involves:
Evaluation and Control Evaluation and control ensure that the strategy remains effective and aligned with the barbershop’s goals. This stage involves:
The strategic decision-making process for the airport barbershop reflects a comprehensive approach that integrates formulation, implementation, and evaluation and control. By understanding traveler needs, crafting unique strategies, executing them effectively, and continuously monitoring outcomes, the barbershop ensures alignment with its strategic goal of becoming the preferred destination for quality hair grooming and relaxation. This structured framework positions the barbershop to not only deliver exceptional value but also adapt and thrive in a competitive airport environment. As an Integrated System of Layered Decision: Barbershop Strategic decision-making for the barbershop integrates operational, tactical, and strategic decisions into a cohesive system that supports its overarching goal.
By integrating these levels of decision-making, the barbershop creates a cohesive system where all actions work together to realize its strategic goal. As a Pattern of Decisions Strategic decision-making also involves recognizing and establishing patterns of decisions that drive consistent and aligned progress toward the barbershop's goal.
Example: Integration of Decision Types and Decision Patterns This integrated approach might look in action for the airport barbershop:
Strategic decision-making for the airport barbershop exemplifies a systematic approach where decisions at the operational, tactical, and strategic levels integrate seamlessly to achieve the organization’s strategic goals. By establishing a coherent pattern of decisions—characterized by consistency, adaptability, and alignment—the barbershop ensures that every choice contributes to its ultimate goal of becoming the preferred destination for quality hair grooming and relaxation. This structured and integrated approach not only enhances effectiveness but also ensures that the strategic vision translates into tangible outcomes, creating a competitive advantage in a dynamic marketplace. Challenges of Strategic Decision-Making Strategic decision-making in business is complex due to uncertainty, competing priorities, and stakeholder alignment. Organizations must navigate dynamic environments, manage limited resources, and ensure effective execution while balancing ethical considerations. Key Challenges:
Addressing these challenges requires systems thinking, strategic foresight, and adaptive leadership to navigate complexities while ensuring long-term success. Navigating & Overcoming Challenges in Strategic Decision-Making Strategic decision-making requires leaders to balance complexity, uncertainty, and competing priorities while ensuring alignment with organizational goals. To navigate these challenges effectively, organizations must adopt a structured approach that integrates data-driven insights, adaptive thinking, and stakeholder engagement. Identifying strategic leverage points—key areas where small actions yield significant impact—helps streamline decision-making and optimize resource allocation. Overcoming uncertainty and risk demands a proactive mindset, utilizing scenario planning, contingency strategies, and real-time market analysis to anticipate disruptions. Leaders must also address cognitive biases by fostering diverse perspectives and structured frameworks that mitigate decision errors. Clear communication and stakeholder buy-in play a crucial role in driving alignment, ensuring that strategic initiatives resonate across all levels of the organization. Implementation hurdles, such as resistance to change and operational inefficiencies, can be managed through effective change management, iterative feedback loops, and continuous learning. Ethical considerations must also be integrated into the decision-making process, balancing profitability with long-term social and environmental impact. By embracing systems thinking, organizations can enhance strategic agility, maintain consistency, and drive sustainable success in an ever-evolving business landscape. Strategy Implementation and Execution: Making Good Business Ideas HappenTurning a good business idea into reality requires more than just a spark of innovation; it demands a structured approach to strategy implementation and execution. In this comprehensive guide, we delve into the essential steps and best practices that transform visionary concepts into tangible successes. From meticulous planning and resource allocation to effective leadership and continuous monitoring, we explore the critical elements that ensure strategic initiatives are executed flawlessly. Discover how to navigate challenges, optimize processes, and achieve your business goals by mastering the art of strategy implementation and execution.
Effective management plays a crucial role in transforming business ideas into tangible success. The key management functions that are instrumental in this transformation can be categorized into three main management disciplines:
Each of these disciplines encompasses specific functions and processes that contribute to the successful realization of business ideas. By aligning efforts across these management areas, organizations can ensure that their strategic visions are effectively executed, operations run smoothly, and all functional areas work in harmony to achieve business goals. Strategy Implementation Strategy implementation is the process of executing and managing the strategic plans and initiatives of an organization to achieve its defined objectives and goals. It involves translating strategic plans into actionable tasks, allocating resources, coordinating efforts, and monitoring progress to ensure that the intended outcomes are realized. Strategy implementation is a critical phase in the strategic management process, as it bridges the gap between strategic planning and actual performance. It requires a systematic approach to ensure that the strategic vision is effectively translated into concrete actions and results. Strategy Implementation: System of Management Decisions Strategy implementation can be defined as a system of management decisions that collectively ensure the successful execution of strategic plans. This system involves a series of interconnected choices and actions that guide the organization from strategic planning to achieving tangible outcomes. By making informed decisions at each step, organizations can effectively translate their strategic vision into reality. Management decisions unfold as follows:
Strategy implementation focuses on building capacity through projects and programs to strengthen the organization and enable it to better deliver value to customers while meeting stakeholders’ expectations. It is an action-oriented process for building a capable organization that can make the selected planned/formulated strategy work as intended. Strategy Implementation: Organizational Change Successful strategy implementation can transform multiple dimensions and areas of an organization. Some key areas that can be significantly impacted include: 1. Organizational Structure
[TBD] A strategy is considered implemented if:
Why Strategy Implementation Fails Strategy implementation can fail for various reasons, including the organization’s inability to manage its strategy well when faced with challenging situations such as:
Effective Strategy Management Effective strategy implementation management involves closing the “execution” gap - the gap between actual/current strategy performance and intended desired performance. Strategy implementation involves changes in people, which typically takes a long time. This makes it more likely that the conditions under which the strategy was formulated will change, and unforeseen circumstances may arise to derail execution. Management needs to understand the interactions among key execution decisions and actions, and contextual forces that create significant and persistent execution gaps as measured by the Operating Model. An important task of managers is to design strategic control systems for successfully implementing and executing a strategy. Managing Organizational Change Managing organizational change requires a system of controls - tools designed by managers to help monitor and evaluate the progress of activities directed towards executing the organization’s implemented strategy. Factors influencing execution success/failure include:
These factors are interdependent and their influences are non-deterministic, making it difficult for managers to comprehend their contribution to successful strategy execution. An organization needs a system and approach to support the management of these factors and their influence on successful execution. Strategy Implementation Management Strategy execution management is a process of managing people, strategy, and operations. It is a disciplined and systematic approach to managing the day-to-day decisions and activities undertaken at all levels in the organization, involving top management, middle management, and front-line managers and workers. Strategic managers create control systems to monitor the quality of products. These systems provide managers with tools to regulate and govern their activities. In strategic control, managers first select strategy and organization structure, then create control systems to evaluate and monitor the progress of activities directed towards implementing and executing strategies. Finally, they adopt corrective actions through adjustments in the strategy if variations are detected. Strategic control systems provide managers with tools to regulate and govern their activities through both proactive (feed-forward) and reactive (feedback) mechanisms. Proactive control systems help keep an organization on track, anticipating future events and responding to opportunities and threats. Reactive control systems help detect deviations after events have occurred and then take corrective actions. These systems help managers achieve superior efficiency, quality, innovation, and responsiveness to customers. They also encourage employees to think about innovation and make them more responsive to customers through monitoring and evaluating their behavior and contact with customers. Leveraging Decision and Systems Thinking Lenses to Examine Form, Function, and Management of Organizations as SystemsIntroduction
In today's complex and evolving business environment, organizations operate as dynamic systems where interconnected elements—form, function, and management—shape their success. These elements encapsulate organization as system parts – people, processes, resources, and structures – all working together to achieve the organization’s purpose.
To navigate these intricacies, leaders can employ systems thinking and decision-making lenses. Systems thinking provides a holistic view of organizational dynamics by revealing interactions, dependencies, and ripple effects. Decision-making lenses offer actionable frameworks to shape strategies that address challenges and opportunities. By integrating these perspectives, leaders can proactively examine and optimize the organization’s form, function, and management for adaptability, efficiency, and resilience. This discussion focuses on analyzing and optimizing organizational elements through decision and systems thinking. For foundational insights into understanding organizations as systems, see “Leveraging Decisions and Systems Thinking Lenses to Understand Organizations as Systems”. Examining Organizational Form The Form - structure of an organization - is foundational to its stability and adaptability. The form of an organization as a system can manifest as closed systems, social systems, or both, depending on how its structure is designed and operates.
Systems Thinking Approach Systems thinking enables leaders to assess these structural elements holistically. For instance:
Decision-Making Framework Decision-making within organizational form centers on balancing structural stability (closed systems) with adaptability (social systems). Examples include:
Analyzing Organizational Function The function of an organization reflects its ability to create and deliver value, driven by processes and capabilities within:
Systems thinking helps leaders examine functional dynamics and interdependencies. Key strategies include:
In open systems, decisions emphasize adaptation and responsiveness to external signals. Practical examples include:
Managing Organizations as Systems Management serves as the guiding force, ensuring alignment between the organization’s structure, capabilities, and strategic goals. This requires adaptability to complexity, as seen in:
Systems Thinking Approach Systems thinking offers a lens to analyze emergent behaviors and interconnections within CAS. For example:
Decision-Making Framework Management decisions within CAS must balance flexibility and control to nurture innovation while maintaining coherence. Examples include:
Through systems thinking and decision-making, leaders can cultivate management strategies that ensure organizational coherence amidst complexity. Integration Across Form, Function, and Management Organizations are not static entities—they exhibit characteristics of multiple system types. Synthesizing these aspects through systems thinking and decision-making enables a comprehensive approach. Leaders can design organizations that balance:
By examining the interplay of form, function, and management, organizations can thrive as dynamic systems capable of responding to complexity and change. Conclusion Examining form, function, and management through systems thinking and decision-making lenses equips leaders with the tools to navigate organizational complexity. Systems thinking offers a holistic perspective on interactions and dependencies, while decision-making translates insights into actionable strategies. Together, these approaches enable organizations to optimize stability, adaptability, and strategic alignment, ensuring resilience and sustained success in an ever-changing environment. Mastering Strategic Issues Diagnosis & Management: Identify, Analyze, and Solve Business ChallengesStrategic Issues Diagnosis and Management (SIDM) is a comprehensive process that helps organizations identify, analyze, and prioritize the fundamental challenges and opportunities they face.
What is a Strategic Issue? A strategic issue is essentially a fundamental question or challenge that significantly impacts an organization’s ability to achieve its goals. Strategic issues often require careful analysis and decision-making at the highest levels of management in an organization. It’s a problem that, if left unresolved, can hinder the organization's success, or prevent it from capitalizing on potential opportunities to grow. A strategic issue in business is a critical challenge or opportunity that significantly impacts an organization's ability to achieve its mission. For example, strategic issues might include:
Addressing these strategic issues helps decision-makers shape the direction and priorities of the organization. Strategic Issues Diagnosis Strategic issues diagnosis (SID) is the process of identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing the fundamental challenges and opportunities that an organization faces. This involves interpreting data and stimuli to focus on key issues that require strategic attention and decision-making1. Importance of Strategic Issues Diagnosis are:
By systematically diagnosing strategic issues, organizations can better navigate complexities and uncertainties, ultimately driving sustainable growth and competitive advantage. Strategic Issues Management Strategic Issues Management (SIM) is the process of identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing strategic issues. It involves a systematic approach to managing the key challenges and opportunities that affect an organization’s ability to achieve its goals.
By managing strategic issues effectively, organizations can navigate complexities, mitigate risks, and capitalize on opportunities, ultimately driving long-term success. Strategic Issues Diagnosis and Management: A System of Management Decisions Strategic Issues Diagnosis and Strategic Issues Management (SID/SIM) create a cohesive system of management decisions that guide organizations through complex and dynamic environments. 1. Identifying Key Issues Strategic Issues Diagnosis (SID):
Strategic Issues Diagnosis (SID):
Strategic Issues Management (SIM):
Strategic Issues Management (SIM):
Strategic Issues Management (SIM):
By integrating SID and SIM, organizations can navigate uncertainties, make informed decisions, and drive sustainable growth. This system ensures that strategic management decisions are well-founded, timely, and aligned with the organization's long-term goals. Effective Strategic Issues Management The effectiveness of strategic issues management is influenced by key elements that play crucial roles in strategic issues management by shaping how issues are identified, analyzed, and addressed. Effective strategic issues management requires careful consideration of several key factors. These elements include:
Integration in Effective Strategic Issues Management Effective strategic issues management is an ongoing process that requires continuous attention and adjustment. Each step involves a series of management decisions that are interconnected and build upon each other. By integrating these decisions, organizations can navigate complex challenges, capitalize on opportunities, and achieve their strategic objectives. Assumptions
By integrating these elements into strategic issues management, organizations can enhance their ability to identify, analyze, and address critical challenges and opportunities effectively. Problem Analysis in Strategic Issues Analysis: A System of Decisions Problem analysis in strategic issues analysis focuses on identifying, understanding, and addressing the core problems that impact an organization's ability to achieve its strategic objectives. In the ever-evolving landscape of strategic management, addressing complex challenges requires a systematic and methodical approach. Problem analysis, viewed as a system of decisions, offers a structured framework to dissect and tackle strategic issues effectively. This decision-centric perspective emphasizes a series of deliberate choices—ranging from identifying and defining problems, to analyzing root causes, assessing impacts, developing solutions, planning implementation, and monitoring outcomes.
By framing problem analysis as a system of decisions, organizations can adopt a structured and methodical approach to addressing strategic issues. This decision-centric perspective enables more deliberate, informed, and effective management of challenges and opportunities. Challenges in Identifying Strategic Issues Identifying strategic issues in business can be challenging. Some common problems and difficulties that decision-makers often face may include:
Strategic issues are often uncovered through a comprehensive analysis of the organization's internal and external environment. Tools like SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats), PESTEL Analysis, Stakeholder Analysis, Competitive Analysis, and Labor Market Analysis can help identify potential strategic issues. Identifying Strategic Issues: SWOT Analysis A SWOT analysis is a valuable tool providing the lens for identifying strategic issues by examining an organization’s internal and external environments. The SWOT lens works as follows:
By systematically evaluating these four aspects, a SWOT analysis provides a comprehensive view of the organization’s current state and its strategic landscape12. This holistic perspective is essential for identifying and prioritizing strategic issues that need to be addressed to achieve long-term goals. Integration with Challenges of Strategic Decision-Making Strategic issues diagnosis and management provide a structured approach to identifying and addressing the obstacles in strategic decision-making. By systematically analyzing and managing strategic issues, organizations can:
Example: Airport Barbershop For the airport barbershop aiming to become the preferred destination for quality hair grooming and relaxation, strategic issues diagnosis and management could involve:
By diagnosing and managing these strategic issues, the barbershop can address the challenges of strategic decision-making, ensuring alignment, effective resource allocation, and successful implementation of its strategic vision. Introduction
Organizations have to change in order to grow. Typically, organizations change as a result of their strategies to re-position themselves and adapt or react to changes in external factors that create market opportunities and/or threats. All businesses have internal and external environments in which they exist and operate; organization change invariably involve change in these environments' factors. Change is a certainty so business managers must actively engage in a process that identifies change in the environments and modifies organizational behavior to best take advantage of this change. Organizational change invariably involves change in people's behavior and relationships in the internal/external environments of the organization. Change in the internal environment factors involve those factors that are influenced by how the company is run, or strategic decisions that introduce conditions inside an organization that forces a change. Managers however, do have some control over how the business reacts to changes in the external environment through management of the internal environment factors which is to some extent are controllable and changeable through the strategic management process. Change in the external environment involve external environment factors that are not controllable by the organization; these include business competitors, changes to law, general economic conditions, etc. Internal Environment and Factors The internal environment is defined by the set of internal factors resulting from either the way the business is run, or decisions made, or both. The factors resulting from how the business is run include: business reputation and image, credit worthiness, etc. The factors resulting from business decisions include:
The factors resulting from the way the business is run - how the organization moves forward both as a self contained organizational entity and its responses to factors in its external and enabling environments - include:
Internal factors can be controlled directly or indirectly; but changing these factors usually involves indirect costs such as lost productivity for example, while new employees are being trained, some direct costs such as a penalty for terminating a lease before it expires. The performance of an organization is influenced by factors or elements in the internal and/or external environments that shape the behavior as well as determine the strengths and weaknesses of the organization that are relevant to its survival and growth. External Environment Factors The external environment is defined by external factors such as characterized by PESTEL factors e.g., Economic conditions - tight lending conditions, Legal - government regulations, etc., and competition. These factors are uncontrollable, and can be modeled as the institutional relations between the business and the external organization/entity of interest to the business, but are not directly controlled by it. [TBD] Managing Organizational Change [TBD] Competitive Advantage A competitive advantage is what makes an organization's goods or services superior to all of a customers' other choices. An organization is unlikely to achieve sustainable competitive advantage leading to sustainable growth and profitability if it fails to effectively convert ideas into good strategies, and translate those strategies into workable and effective actions which are executable. Competitive advantages are attributed to a variety of factors including: cost structure, branding, quality of product offering, the distribution network, intellectual property, and customer service. the more sustainable the competitive advantage, the more difficult it is for competitors to neutralize the advantage. To be successful, you need to be able to articulate the benefit you provide to your target market that's better than the competition. This is your competitive advantage. You must reinforce that message in every communication to your customers and employees through advertising, public relations, sales aids; and even your store front and messaging to employees. Types of Competitive Advantage Competitive advantage can be of two (2) types:
These elements are comprised of factors that allow the productive organization to generate more sales or superior margins compared to its market rivals leading to sustained profitable organization growth. [TBD] An organization can be defined as a 4-tuple, composed by a set of goals and objectives, a set of (direct internal) sub-organizations, a set of institutional relationships, and a set of external organizations.
Organization System Structures The organization structure defines the arrangement of accountability, authority and responsibility of a group of people in a hierarchy, and network of functional and business units, and the governance relations between these units. The organization structure is designed to enhance communication and information flow among organization system elements (people or groups of people) that comprise the organization social system. Within the structure, rules, policies, and procedures are uniformly and impersonally applied to exert control over members’ behaviors. Organizational structures are the manifestation of strategic orientations and regulate information flows, decision making, and patterns of behavior, that is, the “internal allocation of tasks, decisions, rules, and procedures for appraisal and reward, selected for the best pursuit of a strategy. Structures develop due to the need to organize behavior in a meaningful way and provide orientation for organizational members to set actions that comply with organizational strategy, organizational culture, and, as a result, accepted patterns of behavior. The structure is comprised of organization units that organize activity within these units (business units, bureaus, teams, or departments) in which people perform specialized functions such as manufacturing, sales, IT, human resource management, accounting/finance, etc. People who perform similar functions (tasks) are clustered together. Organizations as Systems An organization as a system is a set of interacting or interdependent functional entities and individuals/groups of individuals forming an integrated whole. It can be one organization, a set of organizations, population groups or individuals. Organization as systems are “open”, social systems.
An organization is a system in that it is greater than the sum of its parts. How it performs cannot be calculated by adding up all the work arrangements - like departments - with the resources and processes that connect it all together. Actors Actors represent the perspectives and objectives of the individuals themselves responsible and accountable for implementing the organization design and strategy through their behavior. Actors are taken to be inherently autonomous, i.e., their behaviors are not fully controllable, or are they perfectly knowable. Although the behavior of actors is not perfectly knowable or fully controllable, they are nonetheless not completely random. The behavior of actors can be explained and rationalized through the motivations and intentions attributed to actors. Organization System Behavior The behavior of an organization is usually guided by its strategic and tactical goals. The performance of the organization can be expressed through goal-based performance indicators and measures. Behavior and performance unfolds as observable manifestations (phenomena) of predefined strategies as regulated by organizational structures. This domain puts into effect patterns of behavior, derived from strategies and structures. It makes an organization’s existence as a market player visible. Organizational System Dynamics Organizations are dynamic social systems which are a collection of people with a common purpose. The dynamics of social systems are expressed in terms of the intentional properties of the actors that comprise the system, and the interaction relationships between these actors rather than the actual behavior of the actors. An intentional description of actors' behavior offers a way of characterizing actors that respects the autonomy premise underlying the actor concept. Organization System Interactions Interactions between actors can occur to satisfy goals that are either common to actors or global goals which pertain to the society (organization) as a whole and lay outside the scope of any one individual actor. Considering sub-organizations as a kind of structured logical actor, interactions among the sub-organization units can be viewed as a way of realizing society goals. |
AuthorI'm a computer scientist by education and training, with a keen interest in modeling complex and social systems. In this blog, I explore business through the lens of management as a system of management decisions. This perspective provides a consistent and dynamic framework that integrates various viewpoints, including processes, resources, risk, and goals. By creating structured schemas of management decisions, I aim to guide decision-making and enhance the shared understanding among stakeholders. Archives
August 2024
Categories |